Anti-Scepticism and Epistemic Humility in Pierre Duhem’s Philosophy of Science

Marie Gueguen, Stathis Psillos

Abstract


Duhem’s philosophy of science is difficult to classify according to more contemporary categories like instrumentalism and realism. On the one hand, he presents an account of scientific methodology which renders theories as mere instruments. On the other hand, he acknowledges that theories with particular theoretical virtues (e.g., unity, simplicity, novel predictions) offer a classification of experimental laws that “corresponds to real affinities among the things themselves.” In this paper, we argue that Duhem’s philosophy of science was motivated by an anti-sceptical tendency, according to which we can confidently assert that our theories reveal truths about nature while, at the same time, admitting that anti-scepticism should be moderated by epistemic humility. Understanding Duhem’s epistemological position, which was unique amongst French philosophers of science in the beginning of the 20th century, requires a careful examination of his accounts of representation, explanation, and of their interrelation.

Keywords


Duhem, Representation, Explanatory hypotheses, Holism, Natural Classification

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2017.i2.06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science



ISSN: 2526-2270


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.